Re: (paranoid) interpretation of compilation listing on IRIX

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Bruno.Vuillemin
CC: exim-users, PostMaster
Subject: Re: (paranoid) interpretation of compilation listing on IRIX
On Wed, 23 Jul 1997 Bruno.Vuillemin@??? wrote:

> 1/ How to interpret "LOCAL: Not found" ?


Not sure about that one.

> 2/ The numerous lines "Macro EX_OK refined" shouldn't stress anybody,
> should they ?


That should not cause trouble. I have in fact fixed that in the next
release. Here is a section of the new exim.h file:

/* There's a shambles in IRIX6 - it defines EX_OK in unistd.h which conflicts
with the definition in sysexits.h. Arrange to preserve it, even though at
present Exim doesn't actually use it. */

#ifdef EX_OK       
#define SAVE_EX_OK EX_OK
#undef EX_OK      
#endif             


#include <unistd.h>

#ifdef SAVE_EX_OK  
#ifdef EX_OK
#undef EX_OK      
#endif                                                                    
#define EX_OK SAVE_EX_OK                                      
#endif             



-- 
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714