Re: temporary addresses and spam blocking

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Warner Losh
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: Doug Sewell, Exim Users
Subject: Re: temporary addresses and spam blocking
In message <Pine.SOL.3.96.970630095358.26054a-100000@???> Philip Hazel writes:
: I am saddened to learn that Cyber Promotions is removing ".nospam". What
: do they expect to gain from doing that? The existence of ".nospam" on an
: address is pretty good evidence that the owner of the address doesn't
: want any spam, is not going to respond to it, and may do things that are
: detrimental to Cyber Promotions, like try to get them closed down. There
: seems no logic in this unless they are paid by the number of email
: addresses they claim to be mailing to.

We can't even get them to stop fludding us with biff packets because
their machines are badly misconfigured. We've tried everything that
we can think of to do this. I too want to see them shutdown.

Warner