Re: gdbm???

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: John Henders
Date:  
À: exim-users
CC: Philip Hazel
Sujet: Re: gdbm???
On Jun 20, Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:
>
> . It was reported here that if you recompile gdbm to use lockf instead
> of flock, it all works with the current code.
>
> > i observed that 1.7.3 will use flock by default on linux,
> > and i manually removed the #define from the .h file after
> > running the configuration program.


Umm. Minor correction, I think you mean recompile gdbm to use fcntl, not
lockf above. At least that's what I did and it's always worked for me.

-- 
      Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
                GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
                     b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*