Re: Year 2000.

On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Philip Hazel wrote:

>
> ... but you haven't got the latest development version! :-) The newly-
> added "expiring address" facility (suggested by Brian Blackmore) does
> have to do this. I have chosen to use 2-digit years, with the assumption
> of the 21st century for all but those starting with "9". I shall
> certainly have retired by 2090, and so, I suspect will Exim.
>

Why chose 2 digits ? Why not use 4 digits ?

--Sean