Re: refused relay problems?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Neal Becker
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: refused relay problems?
On 20 Mar 1997, Neal Becker wrote:

> Yes, I see - it didn't like the sender "<>". Should this maybe be an
> execption?


I don't know. It depends on your circumstances. It opens the door to
spammers who know about it. You should be able to specify it explicitly,
I think by

sender_address_relay = *comsat.com:^$

though I must admit I have not tried that.

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714