Re: UUCP

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Alan Barrett
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: UUCP
> From: "Greg A. Woods" <woods@???>
> Just FYI: One of the important configuration options (compile-time,
> unfortunately) in the ancient smail-2.x was a limit to the total length
> of the argument list passed to uux(1).


I think it owuld be sensible to have a configurable limit per-transport
(in smail3 terminology) on the number of addresses and number of bytes of
command line line arguments passed to each instance of a program that gets
executed by a transport.

--apb (Alan Barrett)