> Heh. I just tried on my local nameserver and it won't do it,
hah !
> However, I have the evidence here that someone managed to do it, thought
> they've fixed it since, heres a section of a dig from mail I sent a customer.
> ;; QUESTIONS:
> ;; valleynet.on.ca, type = MX, class = IN
> ;; ANSWERS:
> valleynet.on.ca. 86391 MX 1 204.40.198.3.
Indeed ....
% dig valleynet.on.ca mx
; <<>> DiG 2.2 <<>> valleynet.on.ca mx
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 3
;; QUERY SECTION:
;; valleynet.on.ca, type = MX, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
valleynet.on.ca. 23h58m47s IN MX 10 valley1.valleynet.on.ca.
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
valleynet.on.ca. 23h58m47s IN NS ns.valleynet.on.ca.
valleynet.on.ca. 23h58m47s IN NS nic2.flora.ottawa.on.ca.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
valley1.valleynet.on.ca. 23h58m47s IN A 204.40.198.3
ns.valleynet.on.ca. 23h58m47s IN A 204.40.151.1
nic2.flora.ottawa.on.ca. 12h50m12s IN A 206.248.33.2
;; Total query time: 6 msec
;; FROM: heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk to SERVER: default -- 127.0.0.1
;; WHEN: Sun Dec 22 22:50:54 1996
;; MSG SIZE sent: 33 rcvd: 159
%
