On Dec 9, m.hampson@??? wrote:
> >Ever-receptive to the needs of my users, I'm prepared to change the
> >default setting of ignore_status if that's what most people want. Would
> >a few more people on the list care to cast a vote?
>
> I agree with Piete et al. Mail should never be binned. Infact I might
> go as far as to say it should be impossible to (mis)configure the system
> so that mail is lost.
I agree with this as well. One of the big improvements already with exim
is that it freezes by default many things that smail would have bounced
or lost. Extending that as far as possible is a "good thing", IMO.
--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
