Piete wrote:
> I think we may be talking at cross purposes ....
Yup.
> I thought that you were saying that you could not use a Resent-To: header
> as it would reveal the actual recipients.
Nope. Just that not putting one in made exim add such a header. And
that originally diagnosing this behavior took a little while because
so many programs touched the message. Until I found the blurb in the
SmartList source files mentioning that some MTAs add Resent-to:, I
wasn't sure which program was the culprit.
> I was suggesting that you used a group list in the Resent-To:
> header, so that all people saw was the name.
Yup. you've got the fix pegged exactly. That's the fix included as an
example add-on in the SmartList package, one that I use and am
satisfied with.
--
Michelle Dick artemis@??? East Palo Alto, CA
