On Fri, 8 Nov 1996, Philip Hazel wrote:
> Hmm. Everybody knows that version 1.00 of anything doesn't work. Perhaps
> I should call it 1.42? 1.58? 5.8? Exim '97? Nah, don't like any of
> those...
How about 1.0a58, so that those of us who know, know it's .58, and those
who don't think there's some complex versioning scheme at work?
That or "Exim 86" and claim it's been out for a decade ;)
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts@??? which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
PSB#9280
