Re: fail_verify

On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Nick Waterman wrote:

> The story continues... look what I just noticed:

I will look into that when I can. Thanks for the detailed information.
It does appear at first sight to point to a bug.

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714