On Sun, 28 Jul 1996, Alan Barrett wrote:
> The following patch sends RSET before all except the first message being
> sent on an SMTP connection. It would be better to do it only if the
> previous message encountered an error of a type that makes RSET necessary.
Thanks for the fix Alan. Oversight on my part, of course. Actually, I
don't think there's any harm in sending redundant RSETs (other than
wasting time and an IP exchange of messages, I suppose). However, I'll
see if I can make it do better.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
