Re: several messages

Greg A. Woods writes:

> Indeed. This is the same kind of "enhancement" that sendmail attempted,
> much to the distress of other RFC-822 mailers which didn't want to play
> by "new" rules (eg. "Apparently-To:").
>
> I think the best policy is to properly insert full and proper Received:
> headers, and leave it up to the users and admins to trace through them.
> Perhaps someday MUA authors will write parsers for proper RFC-822
> headers that help validate the authenticity of a piece of mail, not that
> this'll be easy! ;-)

What about using X header lines. Aren't they supposed to be ignored by
MUA's?

-- 
      Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
                GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
                     b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*