Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Todd Lyons
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Should queue processing be rewritten in Exim?
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:46:13AM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:

>If you have tons of cash to spare you can try HyperDrive
>(http://www.hyperossystems.co.uk/). It claims 0.0011ms seek time and
>16GB support.



And if you have multiples of those tons of cash, go up to 504 GB worth
of DRAM storage, connected by external PCI Express. It claims 3
microseconds (0.003 ms) seek time, which is more than the HyperDrive
above, however at 1/2 Terabyte, there's an obvious size advantage.

http://www.violin-memory.com/products/violin1010.html

Imagine throwing this on an Oracle box and putting the redo logs on it.

It also can use Flash memory which nets you 5 TB of storage but at flash
memory speeds.  It does not seem to have any kind of battery backup.
- -- 
Regards...        Todd
When engineers want simple solutions to complicated social problems,
freedom is the first victim...                      --Stephane Bortzmeyer
Linux kernel 2.6.24-18-generic   7 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.07, 0.05