On 06/08/2024 10:54, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-dev wrote:
> Can anyone see what is going on and whether this is an appropriate fix ?
What it claims it's complaining about has to be the third arg to the read()
(and it would have to be able to statically prove the value, to be catchine
it during compilation).
This seems inconsistent with your avoidance of the complaint: moving the
second arg having an assignment.
I think your compiler is broken.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-dev-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
