On 2023-05-26 at 16:41:44 UTC-0400 (Fri, 26 May 2023 21:41:44 +0100)
Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <jgh@???>
is rumored to have said:
> On 26/05/2023 20:32, Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
>> Jeremy, please, i check docs for ${address:...} now, in it
>> states RFC 2822 parsing. I don't know how to ask properly
>> in English. But RFC 2822 was replaced by RFC 5322, and
>> beside that, address string was updated by MIME
>> encoded-words (i have not RFC number now).
>>
>> The docs have to be updated? Or parsing is (can be)
>> outdated?
>
> As I read it, 5322 defines display-name as "phrase"
> and then helpfully does not define *that*. So I can't
> answer for certain, but I'm assuming 5322 and 2822
> are the same for this purpose.
>
> Anyone know for certain?
There's no effective difference in the definitions of the From header
between RFC2822 and RFC5322. It is possible to chase down the ABNF
definitions via references.
--
Bill Cole
bill@??? or billcole@???
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
