[exim] Exim and Sympa, more like a philosophical question...

Currently i use an (old) exim configuration for sympa, where i've setup only
one transport:

sympa_transport:
debug_print = "T: sympa_transport for $local_part@$domain"
driver = pipe
current_directory = /var/lib/sympa
home_directory = /var/lib/sympa
envelope_to_add
return_path_add
delivery_date_add
group = sympa
user = sympa
return_fail_output

and i define explicitly on routers command to execute, for example:

sympa:
debug_print = "R: sympa user for $domain"
driver = redirect
domains = LOCAL_SYMPA_DOMAINS
local_parts = sympa : abuse-feedback-report
retry_use_local_part
data = | /usr/lib/sympa/bin/queue sympa@${domain}
pipe_transport = sympa_transport

sympa_bounce:
debug_print = "R: sympa bounce for $local_part$domain"
driver = redirect
domains = LOCAL_SYMPA_DOMAINS
local_part_suffix = -owner
require_files = /var/lib/sympa/list_data/${local_part}
retry_use_local_part
data = | /usr/lib/sympa/bin/bouncequeue ${local_part}@${domain}
pipe_transport = sympa_transport


I need to modify it, because now sympa use bounce with 'plus addresses', but
curent example configuration define two transports:

    https://www.sympa.community/manual/install/configure-mail-server-exim4.html
    https://github.com/sympa-community/sympa-community.github.io/issues/57

What is more correct?


Thanks.

-- 
  Mentre il cuore d'Italia, da Palermo ad Aosta
  si gonfiava in un coro di vibrante protesta        (F. De Andre`)