Re: [pcre-dev] Some words about assertion docs

Top Page
Delete this message
Author: ND
Date:  
To: Pcre-dev
Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] Some words about assertion docs
On 2019-06-22 16:03, ph10 wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2019, ND via Pcre-dev wrote:
>> Sorry for my bad English.
> > I need to find word that is closest to the end of text and occurs at
> least 10
> > times in that text.
>Yes, I understand that now. I will think about it.
>


Non-atomic lookarounds can be actual only for positive lookaheads.
This constructs can gave to PCRE possibilities to solve number of tasks
that are impossible now:

1. Is for every x F(x) present in subject?
2. Find any (or first or last) x for which F(x) is present in subject


If it's simple to add a Non-atomic positive lookaheads then how are you
about put it to PCRE wishlist please.
It can be looks like
(*non_atomic_positive_lookahead:...)
(*napla:...)


Thanks.