[exim-dev] [Bug 2317] New: Missing Error Check in function …

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: admin
Dátum:  
Címzett: exim-dev
Új témák: [exim-dev] [Bug 2317] Missing Error Check in function SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list()
Tárgy: [exim-dev] [Bug 2317] New: Missing Error Check in function SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list()
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2317

            Bug ID: 2317
           Summary: Missing Error Check in function
                    SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list()
           Product: Exim
           Version: 4.91
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: bug
          Priority: medium
         Component: TLS
          Assignee: jgh146exb@???
          Reporter: chi-li18@???
                CC: exim-dev@???


Function SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() returns 1 if any cipher selected and 0 on
complete failure. However, the SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() didn't check the
return value is 0 or not.

The unchecked return value.
line: 1242
SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(server_sni, CS cbinfo->server_cipher_list);


ref: https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/exim-4_91%2Bfixes/src/src/tls-openssl.c
===================================================================

The specification about function SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list()
ref: https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man3/SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list.html


We find the return value of this call been checked in the same file

Such as,

2000:  if (!SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(server_ctx, CS expciphers))
2001:     return tls_error(US"SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list", NULL, NULL, errstr);



2337:  if (!SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(client_ctx, CS expciphers))
2338:     return tls_error(US"SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list", host, NULL, errstr);



2858:  if (!SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(ctx, CS expciphers))
2859:    {
2860:    ERR_error_string(ERR_get_error(), ssl_errstring);
2861:    err = string_sprintf("SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(%s) failed: %s",
2862:                     expciphers, ssl_errstring);
2863:    }


--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.