Re: [exim] check_srv mx exists

On 21/01/15 13:23, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2015-01-21 12:57, Jeremy Harris wrote:
>> On 21/01/15 12:50, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>>> I go back to the list with that discussion...
>>>
>>> Am Mi den 21. Jan 2015 um 13:17 schrieb Jeremy Harris:
>>>> On 21/01/15 12:13, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>>>>> Am Mi den 21. Jan 2015 um 13:09 schrieb Jeremy Harris:
>>>>>>>> How do they receive bounces?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you mean, how do they receive bounces? Bounces are not
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> on that level. They are just regular mails.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If they have no MX or A, where am I to send a bounce to?
> [...]
>> For me, operating as an MTA: if the envelope sender address has
>> a domain for which there is no MX or A record in DNS, then I cannot
>> send a bounce.
>
> Nobody mentioned "no MX or A", up until your message above. Klaus's
> message to which you replied said "[t]here are many legit senders
> without MX record".

Sorry about that. Klaus brought in lack of A as well as MX
records in an offlist message to me.
--
Jeremy