Re: [exim] Behaviour change in 4.83?

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: George Klein
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Behaviour change in 4.83?
On 30/07/14 15:26, Lena@??? wrote:
> Something even more strange in my testing (FreeBSD, Exim 4.83 from ports):
>
> acl_check_mime:
>    warn logwrite = mime_content_type=$mime_content_type
>         logwrite = mime_filename=$mime_filename
>         decode = default
>         logwrite = mime_decoded_filename=$mime_decoded_filename

>
> Test message as received:
>
> ===========================================================================
> Message-ID: <20140730140329.GE786@???>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="/2994txjAzEdQwm5"
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
>
>
> --/2994txjAzEdQwm5
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
>
> --/2994txjAzEdQwm5
> Content-Type: application/zip
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="price.zip"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>
> UEsDBBQAAgAIALKujDAkU6NQQBQAAABaAAAJAAAAcHJpY2UueGxz7VwJjCXXVb1VXb1vv/dl
> ===========================================================================
>
> mainlog shows that acl_check_mime was called only once,
> wasn't called for attachment:
>
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T mime_content_type=multipart/mixed
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T mime_filename=
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T mime_decoded_filename=/var/spool/exim/scan/1XCUTl-0008SV-0T/1XCUTl-0008SV-0T-00000
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T <= lena@??? H=mx188.mail.ru
> [94.100.177.79] I=[82.146.51.205]:25 P=esmtps X=TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256 S=10094 id=20140730140329.GE786@???
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T => lena <lena@???> R=localuser T=local_delivery QT=0s DT=0s
> 2014-07-30 17:03:41 +0300 1XCUTl-0008SV-0T Completed QT=0s
>
> If without "decode=default" then also acl_check_mime was called only once.
>

Strangely, I think I'm getting the same issue as well. I'm sure I
didn't when I started looking at this yesterday as this was where I
found the quotes.

I haven't got time to check what's changed since at the moment. I'll
have a look when I have a chance if someone hasn't already solved this.

George.