On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 17:19 +0000, Dennis Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > From: Always Learning <exim@???>
> > To: Wolfgang Breyha <wbreyha@???>
> > Cc: "exim-users@???" <exim-users@???>
> > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:56:35
> > Subject: Re: [exim] Router : return_path ?
>
> ...
>
> > > Most likely errors_to is what you're searching for.
> > > http://www.exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch-generic_options_for_routers.html
> >
> > I understand that errors_to creates an errors-to: header which is
> > not universally honoured by all mail servers (MTAs).
>
> The spec says:
>
> If an address for which errors_to has been set ends up being
> delivered over SMTP, the envelope sender for that delivery is the
> errors_to value, so that any bounces that are generated by other
> MTAs on the delivery route are also sent there.
>
> which is exactly what you want...
>
> > That is why I wanted something 100% effective.
>
> ...unless you're dealing with a broken MTA. Then all bets are off.
Ah. Thank you very much. I'm grateful.
Best regards,
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.
