Re: [exim] detection of "<>" in case of spam.

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:40:15AM +0400, Evgeniy Berdnikov wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:25:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > In fact, you don't really need to accept bounces to the *new* addresses
> > either. I don't accept bounces to dwmw2@???, for example,
> > because I never send MAIL FROM:<dwmw2@???>.
>
> From: in mail headers and env-from are different? Looks interesting.

Look up 'BATV'.

> But it seems too complex for simple user mind, and probably could not be
> configured for bare Outlook or FireFox without envelope rewriting on the
> server side... Have you ever run such a service in production?

The whole point is that you run it on the outgoing MTA. So there's
no user configuration/education required.

Matthew


--
Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@???>

Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services,
I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom

For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@???>