On 11/10/2012 11:25 PM, Todd Lyons wrote: >> Will a "local" affect one all addresses, or one (which)? Is that what
>> is wanted?
>
> I recall noticing that 'local' was moved and it still does look for it and
> accept it.
Affecting one address, or all?
Is that what is really wanted?
>> It's slightly unfortunate that the proposed syntax looks like a list, but is
>> actually a command plus a list - and using the same separator for the list as
>> between the command and the list. Is there any scope for a more clear
>> separation? What will happen if additional non-address options are needed in
>> future?
>
> I think that a comma should be used to pass those additional options instead of
> a space. The semi-colon could be too easily confused with the colon when
> looking at it.
You mean addresses here, rather than options?
How about doing them as an address-list, complete with alterable separator?
--
Jeremy
