Re: [exim] Am I right that no_more has no effect within the …

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marc Haber
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Am I right that no_more has no effect within the included simple routers?
On Mon, 28 May 2012 23:24:23 -0400, Phil Pennock
<exim-users@???> wrote:
>On 2012-05-28 at 16:42 -0700, Regid Ichira wrote:
>> I think the no_more has significance for dnslookup_relay_to_domains and
>> for dnslookup. It has no effect for nonlocal and smarthost.
>> One advantage for keeping the no effect no_more in place is not making
>> unnecessary changes. One might argue whether keeping that no effect
>> directive makes the default configuration more, or less, readable.
>> My opinion is that a concise configuration is better.
>
>Explicit conveys information about intent, and acts as a backup for
>unexpected problems and changes upstream.


Thanks for your opinion. The Debian configuration will stay as it is
as far as my decision is concened.

Greetings
Marc
-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834