Re: [exim-dev] GnuTLS status

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M\Phil Pennock at <-
MMDr Andrew C Aitchison at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] GnuTLS status
On 2012-05-17 15:36, Phil Pennock wrote:
> One stance is that it's a case where maintaining backwards compatibility
> is bad, because that is being deliberately broken to improve security.
>
> Thoughts?

In favour of not maintaining back-compat on this point.
--
Jeremy



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[exim-dev] [Bug 1217] New lookup[exim-dev] [Bug 1184] code refactoring in acl.c->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)