Re: [exim-dev] GnuTLS status

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] GnuTLS status
On 2012-05-17 15:36, Phil Pennock wrote:
> One stance is that it's a case where maintaining backwards compatibility
> is bad, because that is being deliberately broken to improve security.
>
> Thoughts?


In favour of not maintaining back-compat on this point.
--
Jeremy