Re: [exim] Continuing development of Exim

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Alain Williams
Date:  
To: <exim-users@exim.org>
Subject: Re: [exim] Continuing development of Exim
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 10:17:06AM +0000, Ian Eiloart wrote:

> Also, look at the deployment stats that are available:
>
> http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.201104/mxsurvey.html
>
> This survey is a year old, but suggests that Exim usage on public facing mail servers has steadily climbed to 45% of domains surveyed that reported software versions in their greeting. Half didn't report, so that figure might be as low as 20%, or even as high as 70%.


> The graph shows what looks like a linear migration from Sendmail to Exim, but
> also steady growth for postfix, and an accelerating decline for Microsoft since
> mid 2007. The latter trend may be due to a tendency to hide Exchange servers
> behind a gateway with perceived security benefits.


Or even, as with one of my customers, an upgrade from MS Small Biz server 2003 to
SBS 2011 ... and I was asked to let the new Exchange use exim as for outgoing
mail -- MS exchange just did not seem to work (I didn't ask why).

They would have liked to move away from a MS server (which only does MS Exchange
& LDAP) - but they are wedded to Outlook on the desktop. There (still) is not a
true open source 'drop in' MS Exchange replacement ... close, but not quite
there. Zarafa keep the 'outlook connector' bit proprietary.

Shame. If anyone has 'spare' time, work here would be really good. Part of the
problem is that what people expect by ''email'' is (from the Unix users'
perspective) several different things: sending mail (exim), retrieving email
(imap), groupware (calendaring mainly).

--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php
#include <std_disclaimer.h>