Re: [pcre-dev] Revision 922

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MZoltán Herczeg at <-
MPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Zoltán Herczeg
CC: pcre-dev
Subject: Re: [pcre-dev] Revision 922
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:

> We could still use the original jit_callback(...) function just it
> should set a static int flag to 1.

Yes, that is exactly what I am going to do.

> I just see you have added PCRE_EXTRA_USED_JIT flag, but I think that
> is unnecessary :)

I am going to take it away.

Philip

--
Philip Hazel
This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Pcre-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [pcre-dev] Revision 922Re: [pcre-dev] Revision 922->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)