Re: [exim-dev] Security of ${dlfunc

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Ted Cooper
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Security of ${dlfunc
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Ted Cooper wrote:
>
> I thought the point of dlfunc was to allow for code to be included in
> Exim that wasn't compiled in to start with. ie If you were using Debian
> 4.69 light and wanted some special piece of code to do do whatzit, you
> just dlfunc include some code and voila, all done. If the binary has to
> be recompiled, it somewhat defeats the whole purpose of it.


Right. I suppose I wasn't thinking enough about the point of view of
distributors.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}