Re: [exim-dev] Security of ${dlfunc

Top Page

Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
To: Ted Cooper
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Security of ${dlfunc
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Ted Cooper wrote:
> I thought the point of dlfunc was to allow for code to be included in
> Exim that wasn't compiled in to start with. ie If you were using Debian
> 4.69 light and wanted some special piece of code to do do whatzit, you
> just dlfunc include some code and voila, all done. If the binary has to
> be recompiled, it somewhat defeats the whole purpose of it.

Right. I suppose I wasn't thinking enough about the point of view of

<fanf@???> <dot@???> ${sg{\N${sg{\