On 13.11.2010 17:22, Philip Hazel wrote:
>> As I read the docs, ovector should always be set in pairs only (n plus
>> n+1) or be uninitialized in pairs. Applications might use this to
>> simplify their test for unmatched subpatterns by testing either n or n+1
>> instead of both values.
>
> I have had a look through the code, and I cannot find anywhere that n is
> set and n+1 is not. However, there are places where values are saved and
> restored, so it does get complicated.
>
> At the start of each matching cycle, pcre_exec() is supposed to set all
> relevant offset values to -1, including the first two. It is therefore
> odd that your offsets[2] (which I think of as offsets[1]) is
> -2147483640.
>
> But ... we know crazy things were going on owing to the lack of a check
> on the value of start_offset, so maybe that was the cause. If you can
> make this happen again, with the patched code, please let me know what
> the pattern and subject were!
Many thanks for your code inspection and explanation. I will let you
know if I find related problems with the patched code.
