On 5/22/2010 10:06 PM, Phil Pennock wrote:
> On 2010-05-21 at 18:23 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> Been doing some recursion. I'll probably figure a way around this with a
>> loop counter. However, it might be nice to add a few features to Exim to
>> deal with recursion. Just like to throw out some ideas.
>>
>> The limit it 20. Maybe it would be nice to make it settable?
>>
>> Is there a recursion loop counter that I can read? If not - maybe there
>> should be?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> I think that I warned you of this problem and described how to avoid it
> when you first talked about your new Exim ACLs for handling URLs inside
> messages.
>
> It would be Quite Nice if you would read and act on responses instead of
> asking how to deal with what you've already been told how to deal with.
> Especially as you were told how to deal with the problem.
>
> http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20090310.203700.ea1a1fa7.en.html
>
> Fourteen months later ...
>
> -Phil
>
>
I'm suggesting improvement for those of us what are using Exim as a
programming language. Exim would be better if it were more of a
programming language. I know what you told me. I just strongly disagree.
