Re: [exim] Setting for extra exim processes

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: W B Hacker
Date:  
To: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] Setting for extra exim processes
Mark Thornton wrote:
> On 23/04/2010 08:08, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>> On 22 April 2010 23:30, Marc Perkel<marc@???> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm sure it's in the docs somewhere but I can't find it. What is the
>>> setting to allocate extra exim processes to listed for incoming
>>> connections. I'm looking to allocate spare processes to increase
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>> There isn't one - Exim has one listener that forks a new process for
>> each connection. SMTP doesn't have the real-time demands that (eg)
>> HTTP has, so doesn't need the kind of architecture that an HTTP server
>> has.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>
> Clients MUA deliver mail using SMTP and incur a delay, sometimes with an
> irritating dialog box, if the SMTP server is slow.
>
> Mark Thornton
>
>


Well - I DID see that earlier today myself.

But only 'coz Dominion Virginia power had an outage of over an hour and there is
no UPS on my cable modem.

Otherwise, Exim rarely gets into the third or fourth second of wall-clock time,
on any given submission - even with a 2,000+ line configuration file full of SQL
calls.

With an MUA (SeaMonkey) set to bang on Dovecot every 60 secnds, yet. Which is
wot first sees the link has gone away.

A decent MUA, after all, is *supposed to* allow for the same general time-outs
as any other smtp 'player'. Closer to 4 minutes than 4 seconds.

So which needs fixed first?

The MUA? The link?

.. or Exim?

Bill