Re: [exim] FW: Exim and SPF

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Eiloart
Date:  
To: Mike Cardwell, exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] FW: Exim and SPF


--On 12 December 2009 14:47:24 +0000 Mike Cardwell
<exim-users@???> wrote:

> On 12/12/2009 14:33, SonicFog wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Cardwell [mailto:exim-users@lists.grepular.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:55 AM
>> To: exim-users@???
>> Subject: Re: [exim] Exim and SPF
>>
>> Ian Eiloart wrote:
>>
>>> 146 out of 242 of them have SPF records. Which is *exactly* 60% here
>>> too... I repeated the experiment for the past 100 days and it was 51%.
>>> SPF is more widely adopted than I realised...
>>
>> Out of all the SPF records you checked how many of them ended in '+all'
>> meaning that everything from anywhere passes the SPF check?
>
> Two.
>
> Interestingly, more of them end -all than ~all.


That is interesting. Do you have an esoteric set of correspondents? We have
a lot of students, so lots of Facebook (~all) and so on.

> --
> Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
> Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/
> Technical Blog: https://secure.grepular.com/blog/




--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/