On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@???> wrote:
>
> There is nothing wrong in working on this together :)
I'm cool with that too. My rpm originally came from a fedora package,
4.69-7, so it is really very close to yours. My only addition is to
put libspf2 tarball in as a source, and then build it as a lookup
module and package it in an exim-spf rpm. I never bothered removing
all the exim-sa and exim-clamav logic from the spec file. If I remove
that stuff, then mine differs very little from yours.
> The packages at ATrpms aim to be compatible (as much as sanely
> possible) to the exim packages in RHEL/Fedora, e.g. using the same
> lock mechanisms, reuse most of the patches, etc.
>
> Having said that the 4.70 packages at ATrpms haven't seen that much
> testing yet and are therefore also in the "testing" section still.
Since our packages are so close, it's a good bet that they'll work just fine.
I'm testing mine right now, but for some reason, dkim verification
always says none. I'll start a new thread and get some eyes staring
at it.
--
Regards... Todd
The best thing about pair programming is that you have the perfect
audience for your genius. -- Kent Beck
