On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:43:20 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On fredagen den 15 maj 2009, Richard Salts wrote:
[snip]
> I just have to point out again that if a message is forwarded to your
server,
> that forwarding should have been configured by the recipient himself, or at
> least with his knowledge, so, theoretically at least, it should be possible
> for you to make exceptions for such forwarding.
That's assuming that the user's mail administrator has set up some way in
which the user is able to whitelist the forwarding server.
>
> It's really not that SPF breaks forwarding, it's that the assumption that
> forwarding should work that is broken to begin with.
I find forwarding to be a useful feature, and I see no reason that forwarded
messages should be treated as second class citizens.
>
> --
> Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
> (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
>
> "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
> Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
>
