On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Bryan Rawlins wrote:
>
> So my question is, and I'm strictly looking for personal opinions here;
> Are callout/callback verifications on the envelope sender when that
> sender is signed more acceptable than just doing them in general? I
> know SCV in general is a hot topic, I don't wish to rehash it's good/bad
> points, just wonder it people whom are generally against it would be
> more amiable if it was only done one signed return paths.
>
I'm not signing (at home) yet, but I'd still be
against it.
(if anything, they'd be less acceptable - someone
trying to ID bogus bounces, and you want to increase
his connect load, seems wrong)
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
