Re: [pcre-dev] 7.9-RC2 test release CMake error

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Szerző: Sheri
Dátum:  
Címzett: pcre-dev
Régi témák: Re: [pcre-dev] 7.9-RC2 test release
Tárgy: Re: [pcre-dev] 7.9-RC2 test release CMake error
Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Sheri wrote:
>
>
>>>> STRING(TOUPPER ${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE} buildtype)
>>>> ...
>>>> MESSAGE(STATUS " C compiler flags ................ : ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS}
>>>> ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS_${buildtype}}")
>>>> MESSAGE(STATUS " C++ compiler flags .............. : ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS}
>>>> ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_${buildtype}}")
>>>>
>>>> Should do the trick.
>>>>
>>>> btw: all " in the config overview output should be moved behind the
>>>> variables like I did it for the two above.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks. Can you check that this works, Sheri? If you are happy, I'll
>>> make the change for the proper 7.9 release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> The first line gave an error, no variable defined.
>>
>
> It works fine for me, using cmake on Linux. The version is 2.6-patch 2.
> I am intending to put it in the 7.9 release.
>
> Philip
>
>


I downloaded your CMakeLists.txt and other individual source files from
here <http://www.exim.org/viewvc/pcre/code/trunk/?sortby=date> which I
believe were updated since RC2. Then I tried to configure using
cmakesetup in Msys.

As before, I got this error:

---------------------------
Error
---------------------------
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:523 (STRING):
string no output variable specified



(Press Cancel to suppress any further messages.)
---------------------------
OK Cancel
---------------------------

if I click OK, I get this:

---------------------------
Error
---------------------------
CMake Error: Error in configuration process, project files may be invalid

(Press Cancel to suppress any further messages.)
---------------------------
OK Cancel
---------------------------

if I click OK, it shows the various settings, and I can configure with
it. But afterwards, I do not get the build summary in Msys (rxvt).

Regards,
Sheri

PS, in my message of Apr 1, I reported that when I tried a comma before
"buildtype" on that line, I didn't get the error, but Christian never
commented on whether that would be correct.