------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821
--- Comment #1 from Philip Hazel <ph10@???> 2009-03-11 12:13:59 ---
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, bill wrote:
> Using cppcheck 1.30 against PCRE 7.8 yields:
>
> # cppcheck -s -q .
> [pcre_exec.c:337]: (style) struct or union member 'heapframe::Xcharptr' is
> never
> used
> [pcre_exec.c:359]: (style) struct or union member 'heapframe::Xoclength' is
> never used
> [pcre_exec.c:360]: (style) struct or union member 'heapframe::Xocchars' is
> never
> used
>
>
> This is not really a bug but just pointing out some possible unnecessary
> members of the struct "heapframe"
>
> I commented them out and tested with default settings and with SUPPORT_UCP
> defined with no compilation errors.
I'll check; thanks for the report. Are you compiling with
--disable-stack-for-recursion? That's the only time that heapframe
should be used. However, the logic is contorted, to say the least. :-)
> On another note, I could only build with SUPPORT_UCP defined if I also defined
> SUPPORT_UTF8=1. That might actually be a bug?
No; it is necessary to have SUPPORT_UTF8 in order to have SUPPORT_UCP.
If you use the ./configure system, that happens automatically.
Philip
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
