Ted Cooper wrote:
> windy_1 wrote:
>> We have a home school project web site for kids ages 6 to 14 and get over
>> 500 spam a day, most totally inappropriate for kids. We had to add parents to
>> filter the mail. In my opinion it is beyond sick. They have all these stupid
>> laws about "child safe content" but they don't give a hoot about someone
>> sending porn to the kids or using the kids' web site email address as a return
>> address to send out porn so the kids get a few thousand bounced porn emails
>> obviously not sent by the kids (who's server can NOT send mail).
>> Sooooooooo do a whois lookup on ICANN's web site and send an email to the
>> person listed as admin. It bounces. Then attach the bounce to a complaint to
>> ICANN for improper whois info on the offender. That they will do something about
>> go figure
>> gayle
>
> You could at least limit the problem by using PVRS/BATV, SPF or simply
> denying all outside emails? If it's a kids site where they can only
> communicate with each other? I'm just stabbing in the dark here since I
> have no idea what the situation is :P
>
> (On a site note, my exim mailing list exim address is now completely
> cycled and the other one has begun life as a conditional spamtrap)
>
> --
> The Exim Manual
> http://www.exim.org/docs.html
> http://docs.exim.org/current/
>
Yawn...... I think one of my adresses gets no more spam now than it did
a dozen years ago...
OTOH, even an alleged NDR won't get past acl_smtp_connect if is has no
PTR RR. ....
I *do* get one heck of a lot more connection *attempts* than 1,000 a
day. Or hour.
