Re: [exim] Multiple Instances of Exim Question

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: Gabriel J marais
Dátum:  
Címzett: 'exim users'
Tárgy: Re: [exim] Multiple Instances of Exim Question
Thanks, this sorted out my problem...


Regards

Gabriel

-----Original Message-----
From: exim-users-bounces@??? [mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Peter Bowyer
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 10:20 AM
To: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] Multiple Instances of Exim Question

On 23/07/2008, Gabriel J marais <forums@???> wrote:
>
> Since the only place that tells Exim about your alternative spool
> directory is the config file, you need a '-C /path/to/config' every
> time you invoke the exim binary.
>
> > Thanks, but I have it set-up that way, where I specify the config files
> with a -C /path/to/config... Like below:
> exim -bd -q30m -C /usr/local/etc/exim/exim.bdslrelay.conf
> exim -bd -q30m -C /usr/local/etc/exim/exim.hostrelay.conf


... but you don't have a -C when you invoke 'exim -M' or mailq (which
turns into exim -bP), so those invocations will use the compiled-in
config file location.

Peter


--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

----------------------------------------------------
IONLINE In-Line Mail Scanner
----------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by the IONLINE In-Line Mail
Scanners and is believed to be clean. For more
information, please contact support@???
----------------------------------------------------


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3289 (20080722) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 3289 (20080722) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com