> I read something about a patch for dynamic lookup methods. We might
> start with that. How about sending a description of the change (text,
> not code) plus an URL for the diffs to exim-dev? Most people here have
> little spare time and would not dig into endless uncommented diffs,
> but the interest may rise upon a documentation that sounds promising.
> I promise I'll review it at least based on the documentation, because
> resolving the dependency issue would be useful to me.
That's a work-flow problem. Either we can do a patch-based email
workflow like Linux does, or we can attach patches to bugzilla bugs. The
latter has less potential for things to get lost if fewer people are
around, so everybody here so far seems to suggest doing that.
Hence, the information on that particular patch can be found in the
bugzilla "tracker item" (
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139) and I
see little sense sending it to the mailing list in addition to the
bugzilla mails that already cross this list.
If you want to propose changing the workflow, that's fine, but I think
it requires even more attention than a bugtracker.
johannes
