Re: [exim] smtp flood defense

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MPeter Bowyer at <-
MMatt at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Matt
CC: Exim Mailing List
Subject: Re: [exim] smtp flood defense
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Matt wrote:
>
>         delay = 10s

Very bad idea to add delays if you are suffering from too many concurrent
connections!

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}

This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Testing antivirusRe: [exim] smtp flood defense->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)