On 21 Feb 2008, at 12:53, Renaud Allard wrote:
> Yves Goergen wrote:
>> On 21.02.2008 13:16 CE(S)T, Graeme Fowler wrote:
>>> ...noting that you should *always* accept postmaster@???
>>> (it's an RFC mandate).
>>
>> I don't know anybody who really cares about that RFC postmaster
>> account.
>> Neither me nor my clients need it, so we're not going to open that
>> standardised spam hatch. If somebody wants to contact the holder of
>> the
>> domain, they can look up a valid contact address in the domain
>> registry
>> or simply visit the web site and read the imprint (which is, as
>> opposed
>> to the RFC, enforced by national law).
>>
>
> Well, just have a look at http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-postmaster.php
> If you are listed there, you may get some spamassassin points.
Oh he is on there - I reporting him myself a few minutes back having
tested it. Should be confirmed in a day or so.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
