Auteur: W B Hacker Date: À: exim users Sujet: Re: [exim] Nabble (was Drop all traffic unless authenticated users
OR specific IP)
Bleurgh wrote: >
>
> Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>>
>> I am seriously wondering (again) about just blocking Nabble. It seems to
>> cause more problems than its worth, and creates a degree of confusion
>> not seen from any other archiving tool. Maybe its because they pretend
>> they are a forum and then gate it into the mailing list.
>>
>> Are there *any* good reasons why it should stay?
>>
>
> Its the "threaded" views I cant get to grips with. But I think that might be
> the same for alot of people under the age of 40! The replies seem to be all
> over the place. I've seen other "viewers" that display the replies in a
> confusing way also.
>
> If I use the "Classic" view in Nabble it appears more "forum" like which I
> much prefer. I'm not a great fan of mailman or any email based discussion. I
> think its had its day. I find the modern discussion boards much more
> functional and easier to read.
>
?? But your MUA should be able to do either, both, and a few other
things anyway. (offline searches, filter by subject, person posting,
tags, phrase-in-body..)
I've got the last 19,000+ Exim posts in SeaMonkey for much easier/more
complex searching than online. Another 30-40,000 Exim from prior years,
are on-box by just switching profile if I need to search them.
No effort. Just a bit of disk space, and not a great deal of that.
Speaking here of SeaMonkey/Mozilla Suite and relatives, also true of
Opera Mail, PowerMail, Sylpheed/Claws mail..
I'm not aware of any 'modern' MUA that does NOT have at least optional
threaded/unread/new/ - whatever.. view choices.
