Hi All
Please excuse my posting of this here, but I felt it was justified. I hope I don't offend anyone. Please find below a couple of posts from today's mail on the Spam-L forum. Please at least visit the first link and inwardly digest the implications !!
All the best
Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Chandler"
To: <SPAM-L@???>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:20 AM
Subject: MEDIA: Anti-Spammer slapped with $60K fine
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/17/anti_spam_activist_lawsuit/
>
> This bodes not well... Why does it seem that the courts prefer to side
> with the spammers?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Iverson"
To: <SPAM-L@???>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: MEDIA: Anti-Spammer slapped with $60K fine
> On 1/17/08, Jay Chandler <lists@???> wrote:
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/17/anti_spam_activist_lawsuit/
> >
> > This bodes not well... Why does it seem that the courts prefer to side
> > with the spammers?
>
> Please consider donating to the legal defence fund. It's being
> maintained by Ed Falk and I trust him that it's all going directly to
> David's defence bills.
>
> http://sfldf.org/paypal.html
>
> Regards,
> Al
_____________________________________________
Website Hosting from only £5.00 per month.
www.medwayhosting.com - +44 (0)1634 856965
_____________________________________________
Digital & Traditional Printing, and much more
www.medwayprint.com - +44 (0)1634 281199
_____________________________________________From peeebeee@??? Fri Jan 18 21:29:36 2008
Envelope-to: exim-users@???
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]:21085)
by tahini.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <peeebeee@???>) id 1JFymI-0000Qv-Gt
for exim-users@???; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:29:35 +0000
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m33so1937063wag.8
for <exim-users@???>; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr1451583wae.96.1200691768785;
Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.168.6 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <56152ae90801181329n7f5f3617o7e44485f275efc54@???>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:29:28 +0000
From: "Peter Bowyer" <peter@???>
Sender: peeebeee@???
To: "exim users" <exim-users@???>
In-Reply-To: <11d001c85a18$72f409d0$0600a8c0@phil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charsetãO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <11d001c85a18$72f409d0$0600a8c0@phil>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 533590195dc7ba49
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Status: No, scoreÑ.6 required~0 tests÷LÐ.073,
BAYES_00Ñ.5 autolearnO version^1.8
Subject: Re: [exim] Off Topic - Or is it ?
X-BeenThere: exim-users@???
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7
Precedence: list
List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA <exim-users.exim.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject¾subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.exim.org/lurker/list/exim-users.html>
List-Post: <mailto:exim-users@exim.org>
List-Help: <mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subjectŽlp>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:exim-users-request@exim.org?subject¥bscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:29:36 -0000
On 18/01/2008, Phil (Medway Hosting) <phil@???> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Please excuse my posting of this here, but I felt it was justified. I hope I don't offend anyone. Please find below a couple of posts from today's mail on the Spam-L forum. Please at least visit the first link and inwardly digest the implications !!
I've been following the story on The Reg and SPAM-L - in my view it
does deserve a mention....
Peter
--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???
