--On 21 December 2007 09:00:26 +0000 Nigel Metheringham
<nigel.metheringham@???> wrote:
> [Resent - this time including the list...]
>
>
> On 21 Dec 2007, at 06:17, zbigniew szalbot wrote:
>> Is there a new version of exim (4.69) available? The official website
>> says nothing about it.
>
> 4.69 is in a "semi-released" state. I have absolutely everything ready
> that I can do for it to go out, including the release announcement.
>
> The problem I have is that many (in fact by the looks of it most) sites
> have ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk as the canonical ftp site for exim,
Can that be changed? Surely
ftp.exim.org should become the canonical site.
> and I do not
> have access to that, so I need a member of Staff of the University of
> Cambridge to put it in place. And its right up against Christmas so
> finding people is difficult.
>
> You will find it on ftp.exim.org, and it has my gpg signatures on the
> tar
> balls (address is nigel@???, key id is DDC03262 - I use a different
> key for this than I do for my work stuff, although there is
> cross-signing).
>
> Sorry for the confusion, but I am currently blocked by my inability to
> update the csx.cam ftp server. I don't want to put out the full release
> announcement until thats fixed. However in general this is a very minor
> bug fix release to deal with PCRE issues.
>
> Nigel.
>
> --
> [ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
> [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148
