Phil (Medway Hosting) wrote:
> It's not "collateral" spam. It's just plain "spam". That's the point I would
> make to the powers that be !!
It is not spam, because it is neither unsolicited (by emailing someone
you allow them to respond, whether automated or not, I would say) nor
bulk. You shouldn't just call something spam just because you don't like
it:
http://www.spamhaus.org/definition.html
The vacation utility on unix seems smart enough to not be a nuissance
and still be functional for those who need it.
Regards,
Jeroen
