On Friday 09 February 2007 10:28, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > OK, pam takes a variable number of arguments, but is that a good excuse?
>
> I don't know. I can't remember. It was too long ago (November 1999 for
> PAM). Nobody has complained before. Does it really matter?
I just wondered if there was any particular reason. It's not a big deal, but
something I feel could be "regularised" in Exim 5.
--
Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
