Re: [exim] HELO and SPF - an intermediate solution

On 07/02/07, Peter Bowyer <peter@???> wrote:
> Here's a first go at sorting out the SPF / HELO issue - what this does
> is allow the spf condition to be used in the acl_smtp_helo acl, and if
> it is used there, magically checks the sender_helo_name instead of
> anything else.
>
> Behaviour in other ACLs is unchanged.
>
> Patch is against 4.66.
>
> Depending on feedback, I'll take this forward to the more generalised
> implementation I suggested in bug 464, and fix the outstanding bug
> with null senders (new bug 467)
>

There's now a better patch attached to bug 467 which has the same
effect as the one here, but also fixes the no-fallback-to-HELO bug.
The patches are not cumulative - use one or the other.

Peter


--
Peter Bowyer
Email: peter@???