Re: [exim] Making $pipe_addresses a real variable?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MMatthew Hodgson at <-
MMatthew Hodgson at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Matthew Hodgson
CC: 'Exim-users'
Subject: Re: [exim] Making $pipe_addresses a real variable?
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Matthew Hodgson wrote:

> Might there be any way in the future to make $pipe_addresses inspectable
> within string expansions in a transport?

The right name would be $recipients, I think. ($pipe_addresses does
magic things, putting each address into a separate argument for the
pipe.)

Please submit this to Bugzilla as a wish list item so that it doesn't
get forgotten. 

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Problems arroung qualify_singe after exim 4.52 (and so with4.66)Re: [exim] Problems arroung qualify_singe after exim 4.52 (and so with4.66)->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)